We were delighted to have leading international arbitrator Peter Baugher join us from Chicago, Illinois for an evening discussion last night on how we can best resolve international commercial disputes in today’s complex and dynamic legal, economic, and political environment.

Peter’s presentation was a fascinating presentation covering a wide range of contemporary issues including:

  • US perspectives on business litigation and arbitration;
  • international dispute resolution in a time of global turmoil;
  • American politics; and
  • challenges and opportunities for the Rule of Law across boundaries and culture.

Our thanks to Peter for taking the time to come to speak with us while he was down in Auckland.

Thank you also to Russell McVeagh for hosting the event and to all who were able to attend especially at such a busy time of the year.

Table of Contents

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

    Choice of NZIAC arbitration upheld by Ontario courts

    A fan-favourite, Whittaker’s chocolate is the choice of many. But Whittaker’s could have missed out on its choice of dispute resolution process and jurisdiction when its former distribution agent in Canada sought to resolve a dispute in the Ontario courts rather than...

    Sign of the times: enforcing an arbitration agreement exchanged by electronic counterparts

    By Belinda Green In the electronic era, documents often do not exist in physical form. Does this affect their enforceability? Recent decisions from Australia and New Zealand show that our mindset about what an original or duly certified copy is might need to change...

    Different dispute resolution clauses in related contracts. Which one prevails?

    By Jo O’Dea If you have a number of related contracts between different parties and they have different dispute resolution clauses, which one do you use? SUMMARY In ZPMC- Red Box Energy Services Ltd vs Philip Jeffry Adkins and Others [2021] HKCFI 3501, there were 3...

    Court thwarts bad faith attempt to lift veil of confidentiality of international arbitration award

    By Maria Cole The confidentiality of arbitral proceedings is important. It is protected by statute and model law. In EBJ21 v EBO21,[1] the Federal Court of Australia refused to have its processes used to erode or undermine the parties’ agreement to, and the law’s...

    New Zealand still rated as global leader for public sector transparency, honesty and integrity

    Transparency International has just released the 2021 Corruption Perception Index (CPI) and New Zealand has retained its joint number one ranking along with Denmark, as having one of the least corrupt public sectors in the world. This year Finland joins the top-slot...

    Wilful Breaches of Contract – Do Exclusion Clauses and Liability Caps Still Work?

    Can deliberate or wilful contract breaches still benefit from clauses that limit or exclude liability? The English High Court recently considered this issue in Mott Macdonald Ltd v Trant Engineering Ltd,[1] which confirmed that clauses limiting or excluding liability...

    Enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Australia – lessons from the Hub Street appeal

    The decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd v Energy City Qatar Holding Company[1] provides valuable guidance on the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Australia, including on the nature of the discretion...

    Court continues to follow modern “one stop” adjudication approach and finds arbitration clause that says “may” arbitrate means the parties “must” do so

    Where an arbitration clause is included in a contract, the courts will not interpret it as giving the parties a choice between arbitration and litigation unless very clear language is used to indicate that is the parties’ intention.   Background Kenli brought...

    Related parties involved in fraud and bribery are taught an elementary lesson: an arbitration award only binds the parties to it

    In a recent judgment of the English Court of Appeal, Vale v Steinmetz [2021] EWCA Civ 1087, the Court has affirmed the “clear and considered statement of principle” that, save for limited purposes, an award between A and B has no binding effect in proceedings between...

    Clause and effect: the importance of well-drafted model clauses

    An overview of why well-drafted model clauses matter Introduction Contracts, like disputes, come in all shapes and sizes. Most parties to a contract are keen to get the deal finalised and signed on the dotted line as quickly as possible. There isn't always an appetite...

    Admission of Arbitrator’s Findings in Subsequent Court Proceedings – the Scope of Issue Estoppel

    In a recent case where damages were sought by an employee for psychological injury from bullying and harassment[1], the Federal Court of Australia considered whether issue estoppels arose from the findings in a prior determination of an arbitrator of the Workers’...

    ACICA/CIArb Australia International Arbitration Conference

    The Australian Centre of International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA) and the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Australia (CIArb Australia) are pleased to invite you to their 2021 International Arbitration Conference: New and Emerging Norms in International...

    Court sees through layers of lipstick and linguistic camouflage in audacious application to set aside arbitral award

    By Maria Cole.   Unfortunately, too many unsuccessful arbitration participants still see it as worth their while to 'roll the dice' by manufacturing a pathway to a court, where strained procedural unfairness arguments rise to the fore as something...

    Pandemics, lockdowns and contracts – can overseas courts give us any insight?

    By Belinda Green. When the COVID-19 pandemic first arrived in New Zealand, there was widespread discussion amongst the legal community about the impact the pandemic and the Government “lockdowns” might have on contracts.[1] Two main avenues for obtaining contractual...

    Peru Ratifies Major Trade Agreement

    The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has recently been ratified by Peru, making it the eighth member to approve the pact after it entered into force in December 2018. Peru was one of four remaining countries that had yet to...

    What are the cost implications of challenging an arbitral award through the courts?

    By Maria Cole A recent decision of the Singapore High Court shone a spotlight on indemnity costs and when they will, and won’t, be granted following the unsuccessful challenge of an arbitral award. The decision highlighted the opposite principles in place between...

    Equitable compensation allowed for breach of arbitration clause by a third party

    By Melt Strydom and Melissa Perkin. Argos Pereira España SL and another v Athenian Marine Ltd [2021] EWHC 554 The English High Court was asked whether a third party which derived rights from a contract, and failed to comply with the contract's arbitration clause, may...

    Limits to appeals of arbitral awards

    By Melissa Perkin and Hannah Stanley. The issue of whether there should be a right to review an arbitral award for an error of law, and if so in what circumstances may it be done, has been controversial.[1] Three recent High Court decisions have reflected that a...

    It pays to check: US$54 million error a “simple” mistake

    The International Bar Association recently published a revised Rules of Evidence on 17 February 2021. The main updates involve adding cyber security and data protection, allowing remote hearings and exclude evidence obtained illegally.

    Third-party funding: has it finally come in from the cold?

    The International Bar Association recently published a revised Rules of Evidence on 17 February 2021. The main updates involve adding cyber security and data protection, allowing remote hearings and exclude evidence obtained illegally.