We were delighted to have leading international arbitrator Peter Baugher join us from Chicago, Illinois for an evening discussion last night on how we can best resolve international commercial disputes in today’s complex and dynamic legal, economic, and political environment.

Peter’s presentation was a fascinating presentation covering a wide range of contemporary issues including:

  • US perspectives on business litigation and arbitration;
  • international dispute resolution in a time of global turmoil;
  • American politics; and
  • challenges and opportunities for the Rule of Law across boundaries and culture.

Our thanks to Peter for taking the time to come to speak with us while he was down in Auckland.

Thank you also to Russell McVeagh for hosting the event and to all who were able to attend especially at such a busy time of the year.

Chapter Review: Compulsory Consolidation in Arbitral Proceedings: An Infringement on Party Autonomy?

Many may recall in the early months of 2021 a story as bizarre as it was disruptive. A 400-metre-long ship, the ‘Ever Given’, had lodged itself firmly in the pits of the Suez Canal, one of two of the world’s most vital shipping corridors. Nothing could get past, and...

Gas dispute to be aired in arbitration

By Richard Pidgeon The Supreme Court of Western Australia in Power and Water Corporation v Eni Australia B V [2022] WASC 376 considered whether a party to a gas supply agreement was justified in attempting to avoid an arbitration clause. On the facts, the application...

Where do directors’ duties lie once insolvency looms?

By Sam Dorne In BTI 2014 LLC v. Sequana S.A. [2022] UKSC 25, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment which examined the role of directors when a company becomes, or is likely to become, insolvent. The decision looked at when directors were to consider the...

Is a party required to accept non-contractual performance during a force majeure event?

By Kate Holland The English Court of Appeal made waves in the last part of 2022 with its decision in MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1406. On a non-uanimous basis, the Court of Appeal held that a party had not been entitled to rely on a force majeure clause...

Separability and arbitral tribunals being ‘open business’??

By Richard Pidgeon In DHL Project & Chartering Ltd v Gemini Ocean Shipping Co. Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1555 (DHL v Gemini), the Court of Appeal of England and Wales dealt with the separability principle. The principle deals with the existence of an arbitration...

Supreme Court of New South Wales finds force majeure clause offered no protection for loss and damage to goods in transit

By Kate Holland   In Woolworths Group Ltd v Twentieth Super Pace Nominees Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 344, the Supreme Court of New South Wales applied a narrow interpretation to the meaning and effect of a force majeure clause, finding that it did not override other...

The Alternative Dispute Resolution Centre (ADR Centre) launches its dedicated website

The ADR Centre launched its dedicated website. This follows the opening of the physical ADR Centre in August 2022, the first purpose-built centre for dispute resolution in New Zealand. The ADR Centre is the first true bricks-and-mortar centre for practitioners in New...

When can an arbitrator voluntarily resign and what are the implications for the arbitration?

By Maria Cole Circumstances can arise when an arbitrator in a domestic arbitration needs to voluntarily resign their appointment. But what is the status of the arbitration if this occurs? Does the court have jurisdiction to step in? This article looks at a recent...

The nuts and bolts of appealing an arbitral award when you need the Court’s leave

By Maria Cole What is involved when you want to appeal an arbitral award but need leave from the High Court to get a foot in the door? Two recent decisions out of Hong Kong and New Zealand look at different aspects of the application process. Any party to an...

Lifestyles of the rich and famous: polo clubs and (non) party parties

By Maria Cole and Michelle Rubaduka   A company that acquired the Beverly Hills Polo Club trade mark was found by the English Court of Appeal to be bound by an arbitration clause in an agreement entered into by its predecessor owner of the trade mark.[1] The...

The importance of certainty in international arbitration agreements

By Sam Dorne   The UK Supreme Court has once again looked at how to determine the law that applies to an international arbitration agreement in the case of Kabab-Ji SAL v Kout Food Group [2021] UKSC 48. An interesting set of facts led the Court to look at an...

Husky Food Importers & Distributors Ltd v JH Whittaker & Sons Ltd [2022] ONSC 1679

By Elliott Couper and Jack Davies New Zealand confectionary and chocolate manufacturer, JH Whittaker & Sons Ltd (Whittaker’s), has brought a successful motion to stay litigation commenced against it by Husky Food Importers & Distributors Ltd (Husky) in the...

All dressed up but nowhere to go: Recognition but no enforcement of ICSID awards

By Dr Anna Kirk and Belinda Green Foreign arbitral awards can be recognised and enforced in other countries by virtue of the provisions of the New York Convention. This is typically a quick and easy process. But two recent cases have been anything but. Why? Because...

Choice of NZIAC arbitration upheld by Ontario courts

A fan-favourite, Whittaker’s chocolate is the choice of many. But Whittaker’s could have missed out on its choice of dispute resolution process and jurisdiction when its former distribution agent in Canada sought to resolve a dispute in the Ontario courts rather than...

Sign of the times: enforcing an arbitration agreement exchanged by electronic counterparts

By Belinda Green In the electronic era, documents often do not exist in physical form. Does this affect their enforceability? Recent decisions from Australia and New Zealand show that our mindset about what an original or duly certified copy is might need to change...

Different dispute resolution clauses in related contracts. Which one prevails?

By Jo O’Dea If you have a number of related contracts between different parties and they have different dispute resolution clauses, which one do you use? SUMMARY In ZPMC- Red Box Energy Services Ltd vs Philip Jeffry Adkins and Others [2021] HKCFI 3501, there were 3...

Court thwarts bad faith attempt to lift veil of confidentiality of international arbitration award

By Maria Cole The confidentiality of arbitral proceedings is important. It is protected by statute and model law. In EBJ21 v EBO21,[1] the Federal Court of Australia refused to have its processes used to erode or undermine the parties’ agreement to, and the law’s...

New Zealand still rated as global leader for public sector transparency, honesty and integrity

Transparency International has just released the 2021 Corruption Perception Index (CPI) and New Zealand has retained its joint number one ranking along with Denmark, as having one of the least corrupt public sectors in the world. This year Finland joins the top-slot...

Wilful Breaches of Contract – Do Exclusion Clauses and Liability Caps Still Work?

Can deliberate or wilful contract breaches still benefit from clauses that limit or exclude liability? The English High Court recently considered this issue in Mott Macdonald Ltd v Trant Engineering Ltd,[1] which confirmed that clauses limiting or excluding liability...

Enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Australia – lessons from the Hub Street appeal

The decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Hub Street Equipment Pty Ltd v Energy City Qatar Holding Company[1] provides valuable guidance on the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Australia, including on the nature of the discretion...